Court IGNORES Explosive Prince Tape Linked To Diddy Case — Was It Suppressed On Purpose?hi

Court Reportedly Ignores Explosive Prince Tape Allegedly Linked to Diddy Case — Legal Experts Question Possible Suppression

Alarming questions are being raised after reports surfaced that a potentially explosive piece of evidence — an unreleased tape allegedly involving the late artist Prince — was not admitted into court proceedings connected to the ongoing federal investigation involving Sean “Diddy” Combs.

Sources close to the case claim the tape, which was referenced in a sealed filing earlier this year, may contain material that could have “significant evidentiary value” in the sprawling probe into Combs’ alleged criminal enterprise. The content of the tape remains undisclosed to the public, but two independent legal analysts told The Post that the omission “raises serious questions of suppression or selective handling of key evidence.”

“It’s almost unheard of for something this potentially high-profile to be mentioned in sealed documents and then effectively vanish from the legal narrative,” said a former U.S. attorney familiar with federal RICO cases. “The public has a right to know whether this omission was procedural — or political.”

The tape allegedly resurfaced during a forensic review of archival materials owned by a former Combs associate who is now cooperating with investigators. While neither the Department of Justice nor the Diddy legal team have confirmed the tape’s authenticity or its relevance, its rumored existence has ignited a wave of speculation online.

Adding to the intrigue, a music industry whistleblower claimed in a now-deleted post that Prince himself had once alluded to “dark dealings” within elite entertainment circles — though no official connection between those comments and the current investigation has been established.

Critics argue that if the tape was deemed irrelevant, an official explanation should have been provided. Others fear that deeper, systemic forces may be working to shield influential figures from full accountability.

“This isn’t just about Diddy anymore,” said media watchdog analyst Kendra Lawson. “This is about transparency, justice, and the question of whether certain names are simply too big to prosecute.”

As the case unfolds, the question lingers: was the Prince tape truly irrelevant — or intentionally buried?